The Piltdown Hoax!
In early 1900’s England, an amatuer archaeologist, Charles Dawson claimed to have found remains of an ancient human skull in the little town of Piltdown. Acclaimed geologist, Arthur Smith Woodward, and paleontologist Father Teilhard de Chardin joined Dawson in studying the fossils. Together they studied and announced the findings of what seemed like a human jaw and other parts of a human skull that seemed to date back about a million year. They based this information off of animal fossils that could help date surrounding remains. The piece of ancient human jaw bone they seemed to discover supported the idea of a human creature with remaining qualities of an ape. During the time of discovery, scientists had already found ancient human remains in France, Germany, and parts of Asia, but definitely not England which may have urged English scientists to push the idea that these ancient humans could have also survived in England. After their announcement to the scientific world, they began receiving backup and support from credible people like England’s top anatomist, Arthur Keethe. He theorized the idea that humans developed big brains before walking upright on two feet. The Piltdown Man discovery supported his theories and it was a huge discovery in the scientific community!
After new technology developed, the Piltdown Man was proven to be a hoax. The teeth of the jaw had been filed down and the jaw had been dyed darker. After more research, scientists discovered that the Piltdown skull was not ancient at all but only less than one hundred years olds and it wasn’t even human! It was a female orangutan. Because this huge discovery was proven to be forged, there were many suspects. Charles Dawson was the first subject. Scientists believed it was him who faked the skull findings because he was only an amateur at the time, he wanted credibility and to make a name for himself in the scientific community. He was also later discovered to have forged at least half a dozen other findings. There were a lot of red flags with Dawson, but could he have done it on his own? People ruled out Woodward and Father Teilhard because neither of them had evidence against them. People also suspected the anatomist, Arthur Keeth. Piltdown Man would have been the perfect evidence to support his theory, which was later proven wrong. Then prime suspect number three came to life, Martin Hinton. Nearly a century after the Piltdown Man was discovered, Hinton came to life as a suspect because of his strong dislike of his boss and physical evidence that showed he was known to tamper with bones.
I find it interesting how human nature plays a big part in the Piltdown Hoax from beginning to end. Whoever forged the skull pieces clearly allowed human thoughts to get in the way of real science. They had human motives. The suspect clearly wanted to make themselves feel better by either making themselves look good or someone else look bad, it was all about ego. This hoax was a big learning process for future scientists. This created a big gape of distrust in the scientific community. Archeologists, paleontologists, geologists, and many other scientists have to go through a series of steps to get a theory fully supported.
When the fraud was revealed, it brought the scientific community together in a way. Scientists had to deepen the process and had to come up with new ways to study ancient artifacts. This fraud led to more research into human history and how we developed. For instance, when anatomist Arthur Keethe theorized that humans developed a bigger brain before walking upright on two feet, scientists discovered this was wrong and actually the other way around.
I don’t think it’s possible to remove the “human factor” from science because scientists are human. There have been many cases of forgery and ego getting in the way of scientists working together for the benefit of a theory or hypothesis. It is impossible to tell humans not to be humans. But looking in a more positive light, keeping the “human factor” in science allows scientists to be passionate about their research which is when we normally get the best results.
The Piltdown man was presented to some of the smartest people of its time and they were all fooled. This just reminds me that seeing is not believing and that I can’t believe everything I see and hear. Whoever forged the Piltdown Man let their ego get in the way. Every human is human.
Watch those due dates!
ReplyDeleteSynopsis: Overall, very good, particularly your discussion of the significance (though the name is "Keith", not "Keeth"). One small point:
"The piece of ancient human jaw bone they seemed to discover supported the idea of a human creature with remaining qualities of an ape."
But humans ARE apes... so does this make sense? Better to argue that this was an organism with a mix of hominin and non-hominin traits?
You also kind of jump from the presentation of the fossil to the discovery of the hoax, but this encompasses more than 40 years. A lot was happening during this time... scientists continued to make hominid fossil discoveries and every single one of these fossils contradicted the conclusions of Piltdown. This is important because it is what drove scientists to go back and retest Piltdown and, from there, the hoax was discovered. This is important for the section on "benefits" below.
Human faults: Good discussion on the faults that led the perpetrators to create those hoax. Other than the culprits, can you find fault with anyone else? How about the scientific community? Why did they accept this find so readily without proper scrutiny? What might have inspired them (particularly the British scientists) to not do their jobs properly when it came to this particular fossil?
Benefits of the process of science: You are answering a different question than the one in the prompt, which asks "What positive aspects of the scientific process were responsible for revealing the skull to be a fraud?". You discuss the benefits of this event, when the question asked what positive aspects of science led to uncovering the hoax. This can be answered in two ways: First, what was the new technology that helped to provide evidence of the hoax. Second, what process of science drove scientists back to re-test Piltdown in the first place? This gets back to the events in that 40+ years when new hominin fossils were found that contradicted Piltdown.
Eliminate human factor?: Do humans bring anything more than "passion* to science that we couldn't do without? Could we even do science without the curiosity in humans that push them to ask those initial questions? Or their ingenuity to create tests of their hypotheses? Or the intuition that helps them draw connections and conclusions from disparate pieces of information?
Life lesson: Good life lesson.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHello Bella,
ReplyDeleteI found your post to be filled with supportive information on the Piltdown hoax. I think you provided great detail on the background information and the discovery of the ancient human skull that was discovered by Dawson, Woodward, and Teilhard de Chardin. I found it important to mention what may have bee the motive behind this hoax, and thats because scientist and other wanted to feel included. Unfortunately, it led to lying and deceiving to get the recognition. In addition, to scientist really wanting to believe this discovery, they lacked the technology needed to actually test the skull.
**Unkown post above was posted by me, reposted to include my name**